Do you agree that fusion has a history of over-promising but "is always 30 years away"?
Answers from the sources
Renaissance Fusion
“For 40 years fusion actually over-delivered: from the 50’s to the 90’s, a key performance metric called “triple product” grew by 6 orders of magnitude. It is now within 1 order of magnitude from net fusion power.”
Sourcerenfusion.eu
Continue exploring
About these subjects
Related reading
- Where do you buy your HTS tapes?
- Are you "3 companies in 1"?
- What are the added benefits of flowing LM walls?
- Why do you need a free-surface LM wall? Why not a more traditional channel flow inside solid walls?
- Is fusion less radioactive than fission?
- Do you need high currents to levitate the liquid metals?
- What is the origin of RF? Is it a spin-off?
- Are you competing with ITER and other public labs?
- Why do you need superconductors –or, specifically, HTS- for magnetic fusion?
- Are there other benefits in wide HTS, besides your specific approach to fusion, and besides the possible indirect speed-up in producing narrow HTS?
- If successful, will we have abundant clean energy or is there a limitation in scaling the stellarators of Renaissance Fusion?
- What are the power requirements to refrigerate the HTS coils?
- What's your stance on publishing and IP ownership?
- What is your position on renewables?
- What does RF do?
- What are the added benefits of thick LM walls?
- What are the "universal benefits" of LM walls, including thin, static ones?
- Why wide HTS?
- Renaissance Fusion — company guide
Data formats and record details
Download this recordapplication/json
- Surface ID
- urn:readyscan:corpus:buyer-question:renaissance-fusion-q131431963-answer-61c155c75d5078ef010d
- Material fingerprint
- fnv1a64:7f9306c168d96bc6
- Membership fingerprint
- fnv1a64:896e43e3211bb190
- Published
- 2026-10-20
- Modified
- 2026-10-20
- ready-scan-subjects/Q131431963
- revision Q131431963:content:119b10d362493940